Warning (2): fopen(/www/htdocs/w008552b/testbett/relaunch2016/frontendDEV/app/tmp/cache/persistent/cake_core_file_map) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory [CORE/cake/libs/file.php, line 152]
Warning (2): fopen(/www/htdocs/w008552b/testbett/relaunch2016/frontendDEV/app/tmp/cache/models/cake_model_default_webbox) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory [CORE/cake/libs/file.php, line 152]
Warning (2): unlink(/www/htdocs/w008552b/testbett/relaunch2016/frontendDEV/app/tmp/cache/models/cake_model_default_kontakt_merken) [function.unlink]: No such file or directory [CORE/cake/libs/file.php, line 298]
diaphanes

Nutzerkonto

Peter Rehberg: Grunts and Monsters: Gay Men’s Online Media Practices
Grunts and Monsters: Gay Men’s Online Media Practices
(S. 155 – 171)
p€ 9,95

Peter Rehberg

Grunts and Monsters: Gay Men’s Online Media Practices

PDF, 17 Seiten

  • Postcolonial Studies
  • Materialität
  • Ding
  • Medientechnik
  • Technikgeschichte
  • Intermedialität
  • Medialität

Meine Sprache
Deutsch

Aktuell ausgewählte Inhalte
Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch

Ändern

Peter Rehberg

ist DAAD Associate Professor am Department of Germanic Studies der University of Texas in Austin. Außerdem schrieb er drei Romane (zuletzt: Boymen, Hamburg 2011) und arbeitete als Chefredakteur des schwulen Monatsmagazins Männer. Seine wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsgebiete sind Queer Theory, Pop Culture und Media Studies.

Weitere Texte von Peter Rehberg bei DIAPHANES
Ulrike Bergermann (Hg.), Monika Dommann (Hg.), ...: Connect and Divide
b€ 69,90 p€ 69,90

Ulrike Bergermann (Hg.), Monika Dommann (Hg.), Erhard Schüttpelz (Hg.), Jeremy Stolow (Hg.), Nadine Taha (Hg.)

Connect and Divide
The Practice Turn in Media Studies

Broschur, 320 Seiten

PDF, 386 Seiten

Media divide and connect simultaneously: they act as intermediaries between otherwise disconnected entities, and as a “middle” that mediates, but also shields different entities from each other. This ambiguity gives rise to conflicting interpretations, and it evokes all those figures that give a first clue about this janus-faced relationship of “connect and divide”: gate-keeper, parasite, amongst others. If we give accounts of media before and after their mediated action, we refer to persons and organizations, automatisms and artifacts, signals and inscriptions, and we seem to find it easy to refer to their distinct potentials and dis/abilities. But within the interaction – the “middle” of media itself seems to be distributed right across the mix of material, semiotic and personal entities involved, and the location of agency is hard to pin down. In case of breakdown we have to disentangle the mix; in case of smooth operations action becomes all the more distributed and potentially untraceable – which makes its attribution a matter of the simultaneously occuring distribution of (official and unofficial) knowledge, labour and power. The empirical and historical investigation of this two-faced relationship of “connect and divide” has thus resulted in a veritable “practice turn in media studies.”

 

The publication studies four aspects of the practice turn in media studies: Media history from a praxeological perspective, the practice turn in religion and media studies, the connecting and dividing lines of media theories concerning gender and post_colonial agencies, and a historical and theoretical examination of the current relationship of media theory and practice theory.

Inhalt